The Orchestrator Pattern
2 min read
Your agent can delegate. This changes everything.
Most people run their agent single-threaded — one task at a time. When you need research, an email draft, and file organization, you're watching it plod through sequentially.
How It Works
Your main agent becomes a manager, not a worker. It spawns sub-agents to handle pieces in parallel.
- Main agent — Conversation, task breakdown, coordination
- Sub-agents — Specific jobs, parallel execution, report back when done
"Research these five companies" → five sub-agents working simultaneously. What took 10 minutes now takes 2.
When to Use It
Sub-agents shine when:
- Tasks are independent — Company A doesn't depend on Company B
- Work is parallelizable — Multiple things can happen at once
- Isolation matters — Clean separation between tasks
- Main agent would get overwhelmed — Too much context
Simple, sequential work? Stick with your main agent. Complex, multi-part work? Orchestrate.
The Key: Bounded Tasks
What makes or breaks this pattern is how you define each task.
❌ "Help me with the marketing stuff."
✅ "Research Competitor X. Find pricing, main features, and target audience. Write a 200-word summary."
Each sub-agent needs:
- A clear, specific task
- Defined boundaries (in scope vs out)
- Expected output format
- A finish condition
Real Examples
- Research: Spawn one sub-agent per competitor, same template. Results aggregate automatically.
- Content: "Write three email variants." Three agents, three approaches, three options.
- Code review: One sub-agent per file. Findings come back in parallel.
The Mindset Shift
Instead of "how do I do this?" you ask "how do I break this into parallel pieces?"
Each sub-agent gets a focused context window, clear goals, and no distractions. They do one thing well and report back.
Start small — next time you have a multi-part task, have your agent delegate. You'll never go back to single-threaded thinking.
Source: r/openclaw community →